<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Beginner&#8217;s Guide to Install and Use Docker with Raspberry PI	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/</link>
	<description>Raspberry PI, Arduino and Electronics made simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: peppe8o		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-4566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peppe8o]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 17:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-4566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-4557&quot;&gt;tarek soliman&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Tarek. Currently Odoo doesn&#039;t releases docker containers for ARM (you can check in OS/ARCH column from tag section in docker hub, &lt;a href=&quot;https://hub.docker.com/_/odoo?tab=tags&#038;page=1&#038;ordering=last_updated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;https://hub.docker.com/_/odoo?tab=tags&amp;page=1&amp;ordering=last_updated&lt;/a&gt;). For this reason, if you want Odoo into a container you have to build it from scratch or from a ubuntu/debian base image]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-4557">tarek soliman</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Tarek. Currently Odoo doesn&#8217;t releases docker containers for ARM (you can check in OS/ARCH column from tag section in docker hub, <a href="https://hub.docker.com/_/odoo?tab=tags&amp;page=1&amp;ordering=last_updated" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">https://hub.docker.com/_/odoo?tab=tags&#038;page=1&#038;ordering=last_updated</a>). For this reason, if you want Odoo into a container you have to build it from scratch or from a ubuntu/debian base image</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tarek soliman		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-4557</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tarek soliman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2021 17:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-4557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[well, I am not able to get Odoo docker Image on Rasperrypi, with or without portainer. there is always errores. I wonder if Rancher can handle the issue. keep in mind that install Odoo on Ubuntu without Docker works fine. I hope you can help with new experiment to be able to install odoo docker image on rasberrypi Ubuntu or maybe Rancher. Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, I am not able to get Odoo docker Image on Rasperrypi, with or without portainer. there is always errores. I wonder if Rancher can handle the issue. keep in mind that install Odoo on Ubuntu without Docker works fine. I hope you can help with new experiment to be able to install odoo docker image on rasberrypi Ubuntu or maybe Rancher. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: peppe8o		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-3120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peppe8o]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-3120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-3113&quot;&gt;Teodoro Visaires&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Teodoro,
Plese copy an use the entire row from &quot;docker run&quot; to &quot;linux-arm&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-3113">Teodoro Visaires</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Teodoro,<br />
Plese copy an use the entire row from &#8220;docker run&#8221; to &#8220;linux-arm&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Teodoro Visaires		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-3113</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teodoro Visaires]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-3113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,
After running this:
docker run -d -p 9000:9000 -v
I get this as response:
flag needs an argument: &#039;v&#039; in -v

Any idea?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
After running this:<br />
docker run -d -p 9000:9000 -v<br />
I get this as response:<br />
flag needs an argument: &#8216;v&#8217; in -v</p>
<p>Any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean S		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-2512</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 16:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-2512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1724&quot;&gt;Ashley&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Ashley!
This worked on my Pi3 Model B, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1724">Ashley</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Ashley!<br />
This worked on my Pi3 Model B, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1802</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-1802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1799&quot;&gt;Robert&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi,
So I did it again (w/o uups), this time using the commands from the portainer site:
docker volume create portainer_data
docker run -d -p 8000:8000 -p 9000:9000 --name=portainer --restart=always -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v portainer_data:/data portainer/portainer-ce

and there was the exact same error message. However, I tried to run it nevertheless and it worked. So it might well be that it would have worked yesterday as well but I simply gave up after the error...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1799">Robert</a>.</p>
<p>Hi,<br />
So I did it again (w/o uups), this time using the commands from the portainer site:<br />
docker volume create portainer_data<br />
docker run -d -p 8000:8000 -p 9000:9000 &#8211;name=portainer &#8211;restart=always -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v portainer_data:/data portainer/portainer-ce</p>
<p>and there was the exact same error message. However, I tried to run it nevertheless and it worked. So it might well be that it would have worked yesterday as well but I simply gave up after the error&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1799</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 06:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-1799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,
Thanks for your efforts! This was all done for the first time so I guess the problem is on their end. However, since this is just a pet project (and there are locked up holidays ahead) I&#039;ll  wipe everything and start over again. Self education...
If I have any success I&#039;ll let you know here!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Thanks for your efforts! This was all done for the first time so I guess the problem is on their end. However, since this is just a pet project (and there are locked up holidays ahead) I&#8217;ll  wipe everything and start over again. Self education&#8230;<br />
If I have any success I&#8217;ll let you know here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: peppe8o		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1796</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peppe8o]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 20:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-1796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1795&quot;&gt;Robert&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Robert,
I used your command in my RPI3 and RPI4 and it works in my boards (standard RPI OS too). From what I&#039;ve now checked in docker hub, I&#039;m afraid that some confusion arised around the new &quot;portainer-ce&quot; container (with final &quot;-ce&quot; added): I can see that they still taggeg their image &quot;linux-arm&quot;, but OS/ARCH results amd64. So, if you previously pulled portainer-ce you could suffer this problem. Solution should be removing image (&quot;docker image rm portainer/portainer-ce:linux-arm&quot;) and then using their &quot;portainer/portainer-ce:alpine&quot; (but this evening I can&#039;t download it, seems that there are problems on remote servers) or old image &quot;portainer/portainer:linux-arm&quot; (which works correctly for the moment).
As said,I&#039;ve just tested old image (without &quot;-ce&quot;) and it currently works. As ce image will be available again, I will test this too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1795">Robert</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Robert,<br />
I used your command in my RPI3 and RPI4 and it works in my boards (standard RPI OS too). From what I&#8217;ve now checked in docker hub, I&#8217;m afraid that some confusion arised around the new &#8220;portainer-ce&#8221; container (with final &#8220;-ce&#8221; added): I can see that they still taggeg their image &#8220;linux-arm&#8221;, but OS/ARCH results amd64. So, if you previously pulled portainer-ce you could suffer this problem. Solution should be removing image (&#8220;docker image rm portainer/portainer-ce:linux-arm&#8221;) and then using their &#8220;portainer/portainer-ce:alpine&#8221; (but this evening I can&#8217;t download it, seems that there are problems on remote servers) or old image &#8220;portainer/portainer:linux-arm&#8221; (which works correctly for the moment).<br />
As said,I&#8217;ve just tested old image (without &#8220;-ce&#8221;) and it currently works. As ce image will be available again, I will test this too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1795</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 18:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-1795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,
After running this:
docker run -d -p 9000:9000 -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v portainer_data:/data portainer/portainer:linux-arm
I get this as response:
$ The requested image&#039;s platform (linux/amd64) does not match the detected host platform (linux/arm/v7)
I am currently running pi os 32bit. I have seen one similar message on github with some foggy replies. Am I the only one? Eveything is standard here, pi is 8GB (not that this matters)

rgds
rl]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
After running this:<br />
docker run -d -p 9000:9000 -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock -v portainer_data:/data portainer/portainer:linux-arm<br />
I get this as response:<br />
$ The requested image&#8217;s platform (linux/amd64) does not match the detected host platform (linux/arm/v7)<br />
I am currently running pi os 32bit. I have seen one similar message on github with some foggy replies. Am I the only one? Eveything is standard here, pi is 8GB (not that this matters)</p>
<p>rgds<br />
rl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: peppe8o		</title>
		<link>https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1777</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peppe8o]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 06:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peppe8o.com//?p=674#comment-1777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1776&quot;&gt;yshariff&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi yshariff,
I suppose you are writing about http://peppe8o.com/install-home-assistant-in-raspberry-pi-with-docker/ and your container stopped is the test one.
When you log-in again, you can restart your container with &quot;docker start homeAssTest&quot;. You can also check your stopped container with &quot;docker ps -a&quot;.
Consider that Test container (as defined in my post) is set to run as a test environment and only with terminal attached. To run it detached from terminal you have to add &quot;-d&quot; option on docker run command. To make it starting again after reboots you have to add the restart policy on docker run command (for example --restart unless-stopped).
Please refer to Production container references later on same post (http://peppe8o.com/install-home-assistant-in-raspberry-pi-with-docker/)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://peppe8o.com/docker-raspberry-pi-portainer/#comment-1776">yshariff</a>.</p>
<p>Hi yshariff,<br />
I suppose you are writing about <a href="http://peppe8o.com/install-home-assistant-in-raspberry-pi-with-docker/" rel="ugc">http://peppe8o.com/install-home-assistant-in-raspberry-pi-with-docker/</a> and your container stopped is the test one.<br />
When you log-in again, you can restart your container with &#8220;docker start homeAssTest&#8221;. You can also check your stopped container with &#8220;docker ps -a&#8221;.<br />
Consider that Test container (as defined in my post) is set to run as a test environment and only with terminal attached. To run it detached from terminal you have to add &#8220;-d&#8221; option on docker run command. To make it starting again after reboots you have to add the restart policy on docker run command (for example &#8211;restart unless-stopped).<br />
Please refer to Production container references later on same post (<a href="http://peppe8o.com/install-home-assistant-in-raspberry-pi-with-docker/" rel="ugc">http://peppe8o.com/install-home-assistant-in-raspberry-pi-with-docker/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
